Abstract
Burnout among healthcare professionals has been associated with working conditions, occupational demands, leadership practices, and the resources available to teams during periods of increased pressure. Individual-focused interventions may reduce specific symptoms and strengthen personal resources, but their effects may be limited when relevant causes of exhaustion remain embedded in the work environment. This study aimed to synthesize systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing organizational interventions, leadership, psychological safety, and institutional support in healthcare settings and, based on this literature, propose a framework for burnout prevention and institutional response. An umbrella review was designed according to PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR recommendations, with searches planned in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science for publications between January 2016 and September 2026. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR 2 and, when appropriate, ROBIS. The literature shows heterogeneous findings for organizational interventions. Changes in working conditions and work processes produce favorable effects in part of the studies, while other interventions show small, null, or inconsistent results. Leadership and psychological safety are associated with workforce well-being and team communication, although much of this evidence is observational. Based on these findings, an institutional model is proposed around four connected functions: assessment of work-related risks, intervention on modifiable factors, leadership preparedness, and outcome monitoring. The framework is presented as a conceptual proposal requiring implementation studies rather than as a previously validated intervention.
References
AUST, Birgit et al. The effects of different types of organisational workplace mental health interventions on mental health and wellbeing in healthcare workers: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, v. 97, n. 5, p. 485-522, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-024-02065-z.
BOSKMA, Amber et al. Effectiveness of organization-directed interventions on healthcare professionals' well-being: a systematic review. EClinicalMedicine, v. 88, 103496, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103496.
BUSCH, Isolde M. et al. Psychological and psychosomatic symptoms of second victims of adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Patient Safety, v. 16, n. 2, p. e61-e74, 2020. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000589.
DECHANT, Paul F. et al. Effect of organization-directed workplace interventions on physician burnout: a systematic review. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, v. 3, n. 4, p. 384-408, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.07.006.
DE SIMONE, Stefania; VARGAS, Maria; SERVILLO, Giuseppe. Organizational strategies to reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, v. 33, n. 4, p. 883-894, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01368-3.
GATES, Michelle et al. Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ, v. 378, e070849, 2022. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070849.
LAPLANTE, Rose D.; PONTE, Patricia Reid; MAGNY-NORMILUS, Cherlie. Essential elements and outcomes of psychological safety in the healthcare practice setting: a systematic review. Applied Nursing Research, v. 83, 151946, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151946.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH. Fundamentals of Total Worker Health approaches: essential elements for advancing worker safety, health, and well-being. Cincinnati: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2017-112/. Accessed: Sept. 11, 2026.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH. Impact Wellbeing Guide: taking action to improve healthcare worker wellbeing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2024. DOI: 10.26616/NIOSHPUB2024109revised072024.
NIINIHUHTA, Milja; HÄGGMAN-LAITILA, Arja. A systematic review of the relationships between nurse leaders' leadership styles and nurses' work-related well-being. International Journal of Nursing Practice, v. 28, n. 5, e13040, 2022. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13040.
PAGE, Matthew J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, v. 372, n71, 2021. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
SHEA, Beverley J. et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, v. 358, j4008, 2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
WHITING, Penny et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 69, p. 225-234, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Burn-out an 'occupational phenomenon': International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: WHO, 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases. Accessed: Sept. 11, 2026.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO guidelines on mental health at work. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052. Accessed: Sept. 11, 2026.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Heidilana Rodrigues Martins de Almeida Oliveira
