287
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 04 - ano 2024
integration of these technologies, coupled with improvements in postoperative care and innovation in
repair materials, has the potential to further optimize CMI results.
It is essential that research and practice continue to evolve to monitor long -term results
and address any potential disadvantages associated with minimally invasive techniques. Continuous
monitoring of patients and long -term benets validation is essential to ensure that minimally invasive
techniques continue to oer the best solution for hernias treatment. With continuous innovation and the
adoption of evidence -based practices, minimally invasive surgery can continue to provide excellent
results for patients, signicantly improving the quality of treatment and recovery.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
Bittner, R., Bain, K., Bansal, V. K., Berrevoet, F., Bingener, J., Chen, D., ... & Hen-riksen, N. A.
(2015). Update of guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall her-
nias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)). Surgical Endoscopy, 29(2), 246-260.
Fitzgibbons, R. J., Puri, V., & Bingener, J. (2019). The critical view of the myopec-tineal orice. Her-
nia, 23(4), 663-668.
Stoel, M. T., & Ipaktchi, K. (2017). Advances in minimally invasive hernia repair: the robot and
beyond. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 44(1), 115-125.
Englisch, C., Günther, P., Kim, Y. J., & Bittner, R. (2020). Mesh materials for hernia repair. Hernia,
24(5), 911-922.
Simons, M. P., Aufenacker, T., Bay-Nielsen, M., Bouillot, J. L., Burcharth, J., Kre-hbiel, J., & G, M.
(2019). Laparoscopic versus open surgery for inguinal hernia re-pair: A systematic review of rando-
mized controlled trials. *Surgical Endoscopy*, 33(7), 2305-2314.
Ducasse, E., Sorelli, P., & Loriau, J. (2021). Robotic-assisted hernia repair: Current status and future
directions. *Journal of Robotic Surgery*, 15(2), 185-193.
LeBlanc, K. A., & Favre, M. (2020). Laparoscopic vs open repair of large hernias: Outcomes and cost