TRAINING DIETETIC TECHNICIANS THROUGH DISTANCE LEARNING: CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND IMPACT ON THE LABOR MARKET
PDF (Portuguese)

Keywords

dietetic technician; NDTR; distance learning; nutrition education; labor market; educational technologies; digital equity; United States.

How to Cite

Biagioni Faccina Ortiz, R. . (2026). TRAINING DIETETIC TECHNICIANS THROUGH DISTANCE LEARNING: CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND IMPACT ON THE LABOR MARKET. Revista Gênero E Interdisciplinaridade, 7(03), 414-437. https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v7i03.3043

Abstract

Introduction: The growing demand for Nutrition and Dietetic Technicians, Registered (NDTR) in the United States, combined with the contraction in accredited program offerings and geographic inequalities in access to professional education, creates a structural gap in the American nutritional health system. Distance learning (DL) emerges as a promising strategy to address this deficit, but lacks a systematized synthesis evaluating its feasibility and impact. Objective: To synthesize available evidence on the effectiveness, curricular structure, and socioeconomic impact of DL applied to dietetic technician training, identifying the most appropriate educational technologies for remote practical instruction and the implications for public education policies. Methodology: Systematic literature review conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PAGE et al., 2021), with searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, covering publications from January 2021 to December 2025. Descriptors included combinations of “dietetic technician,” “NDTR,” “distance education,” “nutrition education,” “online learning,” “blended learning,” “health professions education,” and “virtual simulation.” The PICO framework guided the research question and eligibility criteria. Thirty-two studies were included after screening by titles, abstracts, and full text, with methodological quality assessed using JBI and MERSQI instruments. Results: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital transformation in health professions education, consolidating hybrid and remote models (JEFFRIES et al., 2022). In 2025, only 18 NDTR programs remained accredited by ACEND in the United States, with four offering fully online didactic curricula. The labor market projects 6% employment growth in nutrition between 2024 and 2034, with a growing deficit of qualified professionals (BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, 2024). Virtual simulation, problem-based learning, and synchronous platforms proved effective for developing practical competencies at a distance (MITCHELL; IVIMEY-COOK, 2023; RUSLI; SEAH; LEVETT-JONES, 2022). The hybrid model with local supervised in-person practice showed superior academic performance compared to conventional instruction (HUAI et al., 2024). Discussion and Conclusion: DL represents a strategic opportunity to democratize NDTR training, with significant socioeconomic impact. Its implementation requires a robust theoretical framework — Transactional Distance Theory and the Community of Inquiry Framework —, curricular structure aligned with ACEND, public policies for digital equity, and primary research specifically focused on the NDTR population. The scarcity of primary studies focused on dietetic technicians constitutes the main limitation of the current synthesis and points to an urgent and necessary research agenda.

PDF (Portuguese)

References

ABUHASSNA, H.; ALNAWAJHA, S. The transactional distance theory and distance learning contexts: theory integration, research gaps, and future agenda. Education Sciences, Basel, v. 13, n. 2, p. 112, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020112

ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS. Compensation & Benefits Survey of the Dietetics Profession 2024. Chicago: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2024.

ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION IN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS (ACEND). Accreditation Standards for Nutrition and Dietetic Technician, Registered (NDTR) Programs. Chicago: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2022. Available at: https://www.eatrightpro.org/acend. Accessed: Nov. 2025.

BHOYAR, P. et al. Addressing the digital divide in health education: a systematic review. Cureus, Palo Alto, v. 16, n. 10, e71386, 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71386

BUECHE, J. L. et al. Distance education in nutrition and dietetics education over the past 30 years: a narrative review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, v. 123, n. 4, p. 664-672, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2022.11.006

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Dietitians and Nutritionists. Washington, DC: BLS, 2024. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/dietitians-and-nutritionists.htm. Accessed: Nov. 2025.

COAKLEY, K. E.; GONZALES-PACHECO, D. Dietetics students’ perceptions of academic and health impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Topics in Clinical Nutrition, Hagerstown, v. 37, n. 3, p. 227-235, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/TIN.0000000000000291

COOK, D. A.; REED, D. A. Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education. Academic Medicine, Philadelphia, v. 90, n. 8, p. 1067-1076, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000786

DAVIS, A. M.; VOGELZANG, J. L.; AFFENITO, S. G. The shortage of registered dietitians or nutritionists with a terminal degree: a call to action for the profession. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, v. 123, n. 4, p. 569-574, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2022.12.016

FORONDA, C. L. et al. A comparison of virtual reality to traditional simulation in health professions education: a systematic review. Simulation in Healthcare, Philadelphia, v. 19, n. 1S, p. S90-S97, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000745

GARRISON, D. R.; ANDERSON, T.; ARCHER, W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, New York, v. 2, n. 2-3, p. 87-105, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

HUAI, P. et al. Blended nutrition education with real-life scenarios enhances learning and nutritional counseling capabilities in nursing students. Nurse Education Today, Edinburgh, v. 138, p. 106189, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106189

JEFFRIES, P. R. et al. The role of technology in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Academic Medicine, Philadelphia, v. 97, n. 3 Suppl, p. S104-S109, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004523

JIANG, B. et al. Experience of online learning from COVID-19: preparing for the future of digital transformation in education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Basel, v. 19, n. 24, p. 16787, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416787

JOHNSON, M.; GRIFFIN, A. Student experiences of online problem-based learning in an interdisciplinary dietetic and engineering environment. Journal of Dietetic Education, [S. l.], 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231193100

KERR-SIMS, S.; BAKER, D. M. Faculty perceptions of teaching online during the COVID-19 university transition of courses to an online format. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, Bloomington, v. 10, n. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.31621

MACNEILL, H. et al. Online learning in health professions education. Part 1: teaching and learning in online environments: AMEE Guide No. 161. Medical Teacher, Abingdon, v. 46, n. 1, p. 4-17, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2197135

MASTERS, K. et al. Online learning in health professions education. Part 2: tools and practical application: AMEE Guide No. 163. Medical Teacher, Abingdon, v. 46, n. 1, p. 18-33, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2259069

MCCULLOUGH, F.; GRIFFIN, A.; GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ, A. How can distance learning help with the future of dietetics education? Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics, Basel, v. 4, n. 1, p. 30-32, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1159/000537891

MITCHELL, A. A.; IVIMEY-COOK, E. R. Technology-enhanced simulation for healthcare professionals: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, Lausanne, v. 10, p. 1149048, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1149048

MOORE, M. G. (ed.). Handbook of distance education. 4. ed. New York: Routledge, 2019.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE (NIFA), USDA. Addressing critical shortages in nutrition professionals. Washington, DC: NIFA, 2024. Available at: https://www.nifa.usda.gov/events/addressing-critical-shortages-nutrition-professionals. Accessed: Nov. 2025.

PAGE, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, London, v. 372, n71, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

ROACH, V. A.; ATTARDI, S. M. Twelve tips for applying Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance to optimize online teaching. Medical Teacher, Abingdon, v. 44, n. 8, p. 859-865, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1913279

RUSLI, K. D. B.; SEAH, B.; LEVETT-JONES, T. Virtual simulation to enhance clinical reasoning in nursing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, New York, v. 69, p. 26-39, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.05.006

SAHU, P. K.; DALÇIK, H. Editorial: impact of COVID-19 on healthcare professions education. Frontiers in Medicine, Lausanne, v. 10, p. 1265811, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1265811

SAMSON, J. et al. Virtual simulated placements in health care education: scoping review. JMIR Medical Education, Toronto, v. 11, p. e58794, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2196/58794

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.