Palavras-chave
Coloniality of Knowledge
Intersectionality
Structural Inequality
Educational Policies
Brazil
Como Citar
Resumo
Inclusive education in Brazil presents a fundamental paradox: advanced legal frameworks coexist with fragile implementation. Between 2021 and 2025, enrollments of students with disabilities grew 82% (2.5 million), but 60-70% remain segregated within regular schools. Investment in education (6.5% of GDP) remains below international recommendations (8-10%), and budget allocation frequently does not prioritize inclusion. This critical narrative review analyzes the structural causes of this paradox, focusing specifically on the Brazilian context. The analysis reveals that the gap between policies and practices is deeply political and economic, not merely technical. Uncritical transfer of pedagogical models from the Global North often ignores specific Brazilian contexts. It is concluded that the realization of inclusive education requires: (1) increased investment in public education; (2) reduction of class sizes; (3) hiring of support professionals; (4) contextualized educational epistemology; (5) recognition of intersectionalities; (6) genuine participation of people with disabilities in policy decisions.
Referências
APPLE, M. D. Can education change society? Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074800
BAPTISTA, C. R. Política pública, educação especial e escolarização no Brasil. Educação e Pesquisa, v. 45, p. e180515, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201945180515
BRAZIL. Decree No. 10.502, of September 30, 2020. Establishes the National Policy on Special Education: Equitable, Inclusive, and with Lifelong Learning. Diário Oficial da União, 2020.
BRAZIL. National Policy on Special Education from the Perspective of Inclusive Education. Ministry of Education, 2008. Available at: https://portal.mec.gov.br/seesp/arquivos/pdf/politica.pdf. Accessed: June 16, 2026.
BULI-HOLMBERG, J. et al. From the idea of inclusion into practice in the Nordic countries: A qualitative literature review. European Journal of Special Needs Education, v. 38, n. 1, p. 79-94, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2031095
BUTLER, J. Undoing gender. Routledge, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627
COLLINS, P. H. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge, 2000. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203900314
CRENSHAW, K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, v. 1989, n. 1, p. 139-167, 1989.
EREVELLES, N. Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117082
FINKELSTEIN, S. et al. The inclusive practices of classroom teachers: A scoping review and thematic analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, v. 25, n. 6, p. 735-762, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1572232
FLORIAN, L.; ROUSE, M. Teachers' professional learning and development. In: Handbook of Special Education. Routledge, 2010. p. 377-389. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874509
FRIEND, M. et al. Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, v. 20, n. 1, p. 9-27, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535380
GARCÍA-BARRERA, A. Barriers to the implementation of inclusive education: A review of WoS literature. Curriculum and Teaching, v. 37, n. 1, p. 31-54, 2022. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/37.1.03
GLAT, R.; PLETSCH, M. D. Inclusão escolar de alunos com deficiência: Uma análise da política nacional de educação especial. Revista de Educação Especial, v. 23, n. 36, p. 5-24, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X
GREENHALGH, T.; THORNE, S.; MALTERUD, K. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, v. 48, n. 6, p. e12931, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931
HENDEL, R. J. Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learners. PMC, 2025. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11786651/. Accessed: June 16, 2026.
HERRERA-SEDA, C.; WALTON, E. Teacher education for inclusive education: a scoping review of Global South scholarship. Journal of Education for Teaching, v. 51, n. 4, p. 651-665, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2025.2520792
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH. Inclusive Education is at Risk in Brazil. 2021. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/08/26/inclusive-education-risk-brazil. Accessed: June 16, 2026.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH ANÍSIO TEIXEIRA (INEP). School Census of Basic Education 2021-2025. Ministry of Education, 2025. Available at: https://www.gov.br/inep/pt-br. Accessed: June 16, 2026.
KAFER, A. Feminist, queer, crip. Oxford University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199765683.001.0001
MAHLO, D. Disability, indigenous knowledge systems and implications for inclusive education. Disability & Society, v. 32, n. 7, p. 1022-1041, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1335361
MARHOMBSAR, A. H. D. et al. Inclusive Education: Practices, Challenges and Prospects of Selected Public Elementary School Teachers. International Journal on Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, v. 2, n. 2, p. 137-150, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18506229
MENDES, E. G. Breve histórico da educação especial no Brasil. Revista Educação Especial, v. 22, n. 33, p. 93-109, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X
MUTHUKRISHNA, N.; ENGELBRECHT, P. Towards a transformative approach to inclusive education in the Global South. South African Journal of Education, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1-8, 2018. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n4a1520
NDLOVU-GATSHENI, S. J. Epistemic freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and decolonization. Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367816032
NIEMINEN, P.; PESONEN, H. Politicising inclusive learning environments: How to foster belonging and challenge ableism? Higher Education Research and Development, v. 41, n. 6, p. 2020-2033, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1945547
OLSSON, Å.; HANSSON, S. Designing for diversity: teachers' strategies for creating inclusive learning environments. Learning Environments Research, v. 29, n. 2, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-025-09561-0
UNITED NATIONS (UN). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2008. Available at: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf. Accessed: June 16, 2026.
UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION (UNESCO). Impact of COVID-19 on Education. 2021. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377996. Accessed: June 16, 2026.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Education at a Glance 2024. 2024. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/. Accessed: June 16, 2026.
PINTO, J. M. R. O financiamento da educação no Brasil: Um balanço do investimento em educação. Educação & Sociedade, v. 39, n. 143, p. 407-426, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES0101-73302018182935
PLETSCH, M. D. Educação especial e inclusiva no Brasil: políticas, práticas e perspectivas. Revista Educação Especial, v. 33, p. e2/1-19, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X
SEWELL, A.; KENNETT, A.; PUGH, V. Universal Design for Learning as a theory of inclusive practice for use by educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice, v. 38, n. 3, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2111677
SLEE, R. Inclusive education isn't dead, it just smells funny. Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429031991
SLEE, R. The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Routledge, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820735
WALTON, E. Inclusive education: The leap to decolonisation. South African Journal of Education, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1-9, 2018. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n4a1519