IMPACT OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON BLOOD LOSS AND LENGTH OF STAY IN COLECTOMY PATIENTS
IMPACTO DA CIRURGIA (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Laparoscopic Surgeries; Colectomy; Laparoscopy in Colectomy.

How to Cite

Augusto Rocha Pompermayer, V. ., Caliman Pezzin, O. ., Barcelos da Silva, T. ., Donatelli Ruffo, W. ., & Luiz Teixeira Fully, F. . (2024). IMPACT OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON BLOOD LOSS AND LENGTH OF STAY IN COLECTOMY PATIENTS. Advanced Studies on Health and Nature, 18. https://doi.org/10.51249/easn18.2024.2041

Abstract

A colectomy is a common surgical procedure used to treat conditions such as colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and intestinal obstruction. Laparoscopic surgery has revolutionized the approach to these procedures, offering benefits such as less blood loss, reduced length of stay and faster recovery. This study aims to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on blood loss and length of stay in patients undergoing colectomy. This is a bibliographic review, using qualitative premises, with the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. To better refine the research, the health descriptors “Laparoscopic Surgery”, “Blood Loss in Surgeries”, “Length of Stay in Colectomy”, “Blood Loss and Hospitalization in Colectomy Surgeries” were used. The work in question also included the establishment of inclusion and exclusion criteria and a time frame between 1996 and 2000. Laparoscopic colectomy is performed using small incisions and a laparoscope, a surgical instrument with an attached camera that allows the surgeon to visualize the inside of the abdomen. Compared to open colectomy, the laparoscopic approach generally results in less blood loss due to the less invasive nature of the technique. In addition, laparoscopic surgery has been associated with a shorter hospital stay compared to open colectomy. This is because laparoscopic surgery causes less trauma to the surrounding tissues, resulting in a faster recovery and less post-operative pain. Patients also tend to resume normal activities more quickly after laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, it is concluded that laparoscopic surgery has a significant impact on blood loss and length of stay in patients undergoing colectomy. This less invasive approach offers important benefits, including faster recovery and fewer post-operative complications. It is important that surgeons consider laparoscopic surgery as a viable option for patients requiring colectomy, as long as the individual characteristics of each case are taken into account.

https://doi.org/10.51249/easn18.2024.2041
IMPACTO DA CIRURGIA (Português (Brasil))

References

FLESHMAN JW, NELSON H, PETERS WR, KIM HC, LARACH S, BOORSE RR, et al. Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39(10 Suppl):S53-8.

BOULEZ J, ESPALIEU P, FONTAUMARD E, MEEUS P. Laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery: analysis of 113 cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997; 44(13):40-4.

BENETT CL, STRYKER SJ, FERREIRA MR, ADAMS J, BEART RW JR. The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg. 1997; 132(1):41-4; discussion 45. Erratum in: Arch Surg. 1997; 132(7):781.

LUMLEY JW, FIELDING GA, NATHANSON LK, SIU S, STITZ RW. Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39(2):155-9.

KHALILI TM, FLESHNER PR, HIATT JR, SOKOL TP, MANOOKIAN C, TSUSHIMA G et al. Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41(7):832-8.

GIBSON M, BYRD C, PIERCE C, WRIGHT F, NORWOOD W, GIBSON T et al. Laparoscopic colon resections: a five-year retrospective review. Am Surg. 2000; 66(3):245-8; discussion 248-9.

CHEN HH, WEXNER SD, IROATULAM AJ, PIKARSKY AJ, ALABAZ O, NOGUERAS JJ, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43(1):61-5.

FAYNSOD M, STAMOS MJ, ARNELL T, BORDEN C, UDANI S, VARGAS H. A case-control study of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg. 2000; 66(9):841-3.

STOCCHI L, NELSON H, YOUNG-FADOK TM, LARSON DR, ILSTRUP DM. Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched control study. Dis colon Rectum. 2000; 43(3):326-32.

VARGAS HD, RAMIREZ RT, HOFFMAN GC, HUBBARD GW, GOULD RJ, WOHLGEMUTH SD, et al. Defining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43(12):1726-31.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...