Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
This work constitutes a literature review that explores the significance of Orofacial Harmonization Procedures (OHP) utilizing High-Density Porous Polyethylene Facial Implants (HDPE) to enhance facial aesthetics, contouring, rejuvenation, and volume augmentation. The paper addresses both theoretical and practical aspects of these procedures, providing insights into surgical technique, anatomy of treated areas, pre-operative assessment, anesthesia, pharmacology, medication, post-operative care, and potential complications. The review underscores the role of facial aesthetics in forming initial impressions and how aesthetic dental procedures within OHP are gaining popularity to achieve such harmony. It also emphasizes the integration of positive psychology in understanding aesthetic procedures, considering the positive psychological impacts on patients’ self-esteem and confidence. The work comprehensively discusses the use of HDPE as an alloplastic material for facial implants, elucidating its attributes such as the porous structure enabling implant vascularization and incorporation, along with its superiority over other materials in terms of inflammation and durability. Practical aspects of performing these procedures are addressed, encompassing commonly treated areas (chin, jaw, cheek), incision and suture techniques, anesthesia selection, antibiotic administration, and pre- and post-operative care. Furthermore, potential complications are presented, including improper patient selection, edema, infection, migration, extrusion, and others. The study highlights the significance of proper patient selection, surgical technique, and post-operative care for successful HDPE facial implant procedures. The review concludes that this technique can yield significant benefits in enhancing patients’ self-esteem and appearance, yet underscores the importance of adequate professional training and rigorous monitoring to prevent complications.
Referências
Sheldon KM, Kashdan T, Steger MF. Designing positive psychology : taking stock and moving forward. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
O’donohue WT, Fisher JE. Cognitive behavior therapy : applying empirically supported techniques in your practice. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons; 2009
Souza José Carlos, Lopes Luiz Henrique Bernardinelli, Souza Vítor Cruz Rosa Pires de. A Dimensão do Belo no Tempo. Rev. Psicol. Saúde [Internet]. 2018 Dez [citado 2023 Jun 27];10(3):87-94. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2177-093X2018000300008&lng=pt. http://dx.doi.org/10.20435/pssa.v10i3.637.
Resolução CFO-198/2019 [Internet]. CFO. Available from: https://website.cfo.org.br/resolucao- cfo-198-2019/
Couldwell WT, Chen TC, Weiss MH, Fukushima T, Dougherty W. Cranioplasty with the Medpor porous polyethylene Flexblock implant. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1994 Sep;81(3):483–6.
Maas CS, Merwin GE, Wilson JR, Frey MD, Maves MD. Comparison of Biomaterials for Facial Bone Augmentation. 1990 May 1;116(5):551–6.
Matros E, Momoh A, Yaremchuk MJ. The Aging Midfacial Skeleton: Implications for Rejuvenation and Reconstruction Using Implants. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2009 Nov;25(04):252–9.
Matros E, Momoh A, Yaremchuk MJ. The Aging Midfacial Skeleton: Implications for Rejuvenation and Reconstruction Using Implants. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2009 Nov;25(04):252–9.
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Li X, Pan J, Li J. Reconstruction of Mandibular Contour Using Individualized HighDensity Porous Polyethylene (Medpor®) Implants Under the Guidance of Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D-Printed Surgical Templates. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2017 Dec 19;42(1):118–25.
Maas CS, Merwin GE, Wilson JR, Frey MD, Maves MD. Comparison of Biomaterials for Facial Bone Augmentation. 1990 May 1;116(5):551–6.
Khorasani M, Janbaz P, Rayati F. Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2018;44(3):128.
Kwon TG, Kang SM, Hwang HD. Three-dimensional soft tissue change after paranasal augmentation with porous polyethylene. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;43(7):816-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 27. PMID: 24685262.
Romano JJ, IIiff NT, Manson PN. Use of Medpor Porous Polyethylene Implants in 140 Patients with Facial Fractures. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 1993 Jul;4(3):142–7.
. Kato JM, Matayoshi S. Visual loss after aesthetic facial filler injection: a literature review on an ophthalmologic issue. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. 2022;85(3).
Maia M, Klein ES, Monje TV, Pagliosa C. Reconstrução da estrutura facial por biomateriais: revisão de literatura. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (Impresso). 2010 Sep;25(3):566–72.
Niechajev I. Facial Reconstruction Using Porous High-Density Polyethylene (Medpor): Long-Term Results. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2012 Jun 9;36(4):917–27.
LKWang Y,, Zhang Z, Li X, Pan . Reconstruction of mandibular contour using individualized high-density porous polyethylene implants under the guidance of virtual surgical planning and 3d-printed surgical templates. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018;42(1):1154.21.
Yaremchuk MJ, Doumit G, Thomas MA. Alloplastic augmentation of the facial skeleton: an occasional adjunct or alternative to orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May;127(5):2021-2030. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820e9263. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):340. Doumit, Gabe [corrected to Doumit, Gaby]. PMID: 21532429.
Odum BC, Bussard GM, Lewis RP, Lara WC, Edlich RF, Gampper TJ. High-density porous polyethylene for facial bone augmentation. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1998;8(1):3-17. PMID: 10177457.
Cox AJ 3rd, Wang TD. Skeletal implants in aesthetic facial surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 1999;15(1):3-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1064296. PMID: 11816096.
Sevin K, Askar I, Saray A, Yormuk E. Exposure of high-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) used for contour restoration and treatment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Feb;38(1):44-9. doi: 10.1054/bjom.1998.0038. PMID: 10783447.
Robiony M, Costa F, Demitri V, Politi M. Simultaneous malaroplasty with porous polyethylene implants and orthognathic surgery for correction of malar deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Jun;56(6):734-41; discussion 742. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90809-6. PMID: 9632332.
Claude O, Domergue Than Trong E, Blanc R, Ascher B, Bagot M, Meningaud JP, Lantieri L. Traitement des lipoatrophies faciales utilisant des implants de Medpor en polyéthylène poreux [Treatment of HIV facial lipoatrophy with a submalar porous polyethylene implant (Medpor)]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2009 Feb;54(1):21-8. French. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2008.05.009. Epub 2008 Nov 29. PMID: 19042066.
Facial reconstruction using porous high-density polyethylene (medpor): long-term results. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;36(4):917-27. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-9911-4. Epub 2012 Jun 9. PMID: 22684610.
Putz R, Pabst R. Atlas de anatomia humana Sobotta: Volume 2: Tronco, vísceras, e extremidade inferior [Internet]. pesquisa.bvsalud.org. 2005 [cited 2023 Jun 27]. p. 398–8. Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-766543.
Gui L, Huang L, Zhang Z. Genioplasty and Chin Augmentation with Medpore Implants: A Report of 650 Cases. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2007 Dec 25;32(2):220–6.
Perrando M, Beuter M, Brondani CM, Roso CC, Santos TM dos, Predebon GR. O preparo pré-operatório na ótica do paciente cirúrgico. Rev Enferm UFSM [Internet]. 21º de janeiro de 2011 [citado 27º de junho de 2023];1(1):61-70. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reufsm/article/view/200428.
Patel K, Brandstetter K. Solid implants in facial plastic surgery: potential complications and how to prevent them. Facial Plast Surg 2016;32(5):520-31.
Arbex MA, Varella M de CL, Siqueira HR de, Mello FAF de. Drogas antituberculose: interações medicamentosas, efeitos adversos e utilização em situações especiais - parte 1: fármacos de primeira linha. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia [Internet]. 2010 Oct;36(5):626–40. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1806- 37132010000500016&script=sci_arttext&tlng=em.
fliphtml5.com. 06 - Revisão sistemática sobre detalhes cirúrgicos dos implantes faciais de polietileno poroso de alta densidade - - FACE v2n1 [Internet]. Fliphtml5. [cited 2023 Jun 20]. Available from: https://fliphtml5.com/wiun/kcbn.
Ridwan-Pramana A, Wol~ J, Raziei A, Ashton-James CE, Forouzanfar T. Porous polyethylene implants in facial reconstruction: Outcome and complications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43(8):1330-4.
Ehrmantraut S, Laschke MW, Merkel D, Scheuer C, Willnecker V, Meyer-Lindenberg A et al. Perioperative steroid administration inhibits angiogenic host tissue response to porous polyethylene (Medpor) implants. Eur Cell Mater 2010;19:107-16.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Victor Flávio de Oliveira e Oliveira, Aldenízia dos Santos Souza, Ana Victória Santana Santos, Gleison Lopes Leite, João Paulo Mello Lócio, Julia Marita Ribeiro de Amorim, Marcone Natágoras Alves de Albuquerque, Maria Beatriz Araújo de França, Mauri Gomes de Sousa, Welber Dannylo Macedo Rodrigues