INVESTIGATION OF MORAL SENSITIVITY IN NURSES
INVESTIGATION OF MORAL (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Ethics, Sensitivity, Moral Sensitivity, Nursing and Ethics, Ethical Behaviour

How to Cite

Esmailzadeh, S. ., Nurluöz, Özdem ., & Çakırcalı, E. . (2021). INVESTIGATION OF MORAL SENSITIVITY IN NURSES. Revista Gênero E Interdisciplinaridade, 2(01). https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v2i01.149

Abstract

Nurses should have an advanced moral sensitivity, which is defined as the ability to distinguish ethical problem, in order to make the right decision regarding the identification and analysis of ethical problems.Each nurse may have different perspective on ethical problems and solution approach respectively. Moral sensitivity level in nurses is a major factor in such variation. Hence, the analysis on moral sensitivity among nurses and identification of different variables affecting their moral sensitivity are crucial. This study aims to measure the moral and ethical sensitivity of hospital nurses towards the patients and other staff. The sample of this study, which was planned as descriptive and cross-sectional, is the voluntary nurses from two training hospitals (n=600). Introductory information form and Moral Sensitivity Scale were both used in data collection. The research data was analysed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 24.0. Frequency analysis was utilised for the distribution of socio-demographic characteristics; the comparison of data set with normal distribution was analysed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test – non-parametric hypothesis tests were conducted as data found not compatible with normal distribution. In consideration with results, majority of nurses encounter with ethical problems at their departments. While 50.86% of nurses overcome such problems, around 20% of them are not able to solve their problems accordingly. Conclusion: The findings reflected that the moral sensitivity levels among nurses positively differ with their professional seniority and way of work whereas some factors negatively affect the moral sensitivity levels.

https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v2i01.149
INVESTIGATION OF MORAL (Português (Brasil))

References

Aksu, T., & Akyol, A. (2011). İzmir’dekihemşirelerinetikduyarlılıklarınınincelenmesi.
TürkiyeKlinikleri Journal of Medical Ethics-Law and History, 19, 16-24
Ali Reza Salar, SadeghZare and EbrahimSharifzadeh, (2016). The Survey of NursingStudents’ Ethical Sensitivity Salar et al., Biology and Medicine (Aligarh), 8:5
Aydın İp. YönetselmeslekiveÖrgütseletik. Ankara: PegemYayıncılık 2012.
Başak, T., Uzun, Ş., & Arslan, F. (2010).Yoğunbakımhemşirelerininetikduyarlılıklarının
incelenmesi.Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, 52, 76-81.
Bayık, A. (1995) “HemşirelikEğitimindeEtikKonusununÖğretimi”, HemşirelikBülteni 9/37, 19-30.
Çobanoğlu, N. (2004). Bilimpolitikalarınınyayınetiğineyansımaları. SağlıkBilimlerinde
SüreliYayıncılık. Yılmaz, O. (Ed.), Ankara: TÜBİTAK, 60-69. Dalcalı, BK., &Şendir, M. (2016). Hemşirelerinkişiseldeğerleriileetikduyarlılıkları
arasındakiilişkininbelirlenmesi. Florence Nightingale HemşirelikDergisi, 24, 1-9.
DikmenYurdanur (2013). YoğunBakımHemşirelerindeEtikDuyarlılığınİncelenmesi, CumhuriyetHemşirelikDergisi.
Filizöz, B., Aşcı, A., Mesci, G., &Bağcıvan, E. (2015). Hemşirelerdeetikduyarlılık: Sivas ili merkezkamuhastanelerindebiraraştırma. İşAhlakıDergisi, 8, 47-66.
Fry S.( 2000). ICN, Internetional Council of Nurses, Hemşirelikuygulamalarındaetik. Bağ B. (Çevirieditörü). Erzurum: BakanlarMatbaacılık,: 185-193.
Halstead J. Taylor MJ. Learning and teaching about values: a review of recent research.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 2000; 30:2 169-202.
Kahriman, İ. veYeşilçiçekÇalık K. (2017). Klinik Hemşirelerin Etik Duyarlılığı, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi GÜSBD 2017; 6(3): 111 – 121, AraştırmaMakalesi.
Kim YS, Park JW, Son YJ. A Longitudinal Study on the Development of Moral Judgement inKorean Nursing Students. Nursing Ethics, 2004; 11:3 254-265.
O’Keefe, M. H. (2001). Nursing practice and the low: Avoiding malpractice and other legal risks, Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Özcan M, Akpınar A, Ergin AB. Personal and professional values grading among midwiferystudents. Nurse Ethics, 2012; 19:3 399–407.
Öztürk H, Hintistan S, Kasım S veCandaş, B. (2009). “YoğunBakımÜnitelerindeHekimve
HemşirelerinEtikDuyarlılığı”. YoğunBakımHemşireliğiDergisi, 13(2):77–84.
Pekcan, H.S. (2007). Yalova İli veÇevresindeGörevYapanHekimlerinveHemşirelerinEtik
Duyarlılıklar”. Marmara ÜniversitesiSağlıkBilimleriEnstitüsü, YüksekLisansTezi,
İstanbul.
Redman BK, Fry S. Nurses’ ethical conflicts: what ıs really known about them, NursingEthics, 2000; 7:4 360-366.
Quinn, C.A. &Smith, M.D. (1987). The Professional Commitment: Issues and ethics in nursing, Philadelphia: Saunders
Tosun, H.(2005)SağlıkBakımıUygulamalarındaDeneyimlenenEtikİkilemlereKarşı
HekimveHemşirelerinEtikDuyarlılıklarınınBelirlenmesi.YayınlanmamışDoktoraTezi,
İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul ÜniversitesiSağlıkBilimleriEnstitüsü. Danışman: Prof.Dr.
KameryaBabadağ, İstanbul.https://tez.yok.gov. tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ adresindenedinilmiştir.
Lützén K, Blom T, Ewalds-Kvist B, Winch S (2010) Moral stress, moral climate and moralsensitivity among psychiatric professionals. Nurs Ethics 17: 213-224.
Jahantigh M, Arbabisarjou A, Zare S, Shahrakipour M, Ghoreishinia G (2015) Hospital’sethical climate and nurse’s desired ethical climate in Ali-ebn-Abitaleb and Khatam-al-Anbia hospital of Zahedan (2015). Der Pharm Lett 7: 427-431.

Miandoab NY, Arbabisarjou A, Zare S, Shahrakipour M, Bradang N (2015) Operating room
staff attitude toward the ethical climate of educational hospitals. Der Pharm Lett 7: 122-125.
Sarı, D. ve ark. (2017) AcilServisHemşirelerininEtikDuyarlılıklarınınİncelenmesi. Dokuz EylülÜniversitesiHemşirelikFakültesiElektronikDergisi
Schroeter K (1999) Ethical perception and resulting action in perioperative nurses. AORN J 69: 991-1002.
Ulrich C, O’Donnell P, Taylor C et al. (2007). Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job
satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the united states, Social Science & Medicine
65:1708-1719.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...