TRAFFIC CRIMES
TRAFFIC CRIMES (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

traffic, crimes, intent, and negligence.

How to Cite

Cabral de Albuquerque, R. . (2024). TRAFFIC CRIMES: ASPECTS BETWEEN INTENTIONAL AND GUILTY CRIME. Revista Gênero E Interdisciplinaridade, 5(01), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v5i01.1911

Abstract

The topic of traffic crimes is a growing concern in many countries, including Brazil, due to serious accidents, injuries, and deaths resulting from violations of traffic laws. The aim of this work is to analyze the characteristics and main differences between intentional and negligent crimes, as well as their application to traffic offenses. The distinction between intentional and negligent crimes in traffic offenses lies in the presence or absence of intent, which is the deliberate and conscious will to commit the crime, according to current legislation. The classification of a traffic offense as intentional or negligent depends on a detailed analysis of the circumstances of each specific case, taking into account factors such as the conduct of the agent, the resulting outcome, the causal link, and the agent’s culpability, based on court precedents. The development of this work highlights that traffic offenses are classified in the Brazilian Traffic Code (CTB) and can be categorized as intentional or negligent, depending on the conduct of the agent and the resulting outcome. Intentional crimes occur when the driver acts with the intention of causing the outcome, while negligent crimes occur when the driver behaves negligently, recklessly, or in an unskilled manner, resulting in a traffic accident. The reference work used in this study emphasizes the importance of considering the presence or absence of intent in differentiating between intentional and negligent crimes in traffic offenses and underscores the need for an individualized analysis of each case. This research employed a bibliographic review methodology, which was essential to provide a theoretical foundation for the study and identify gaps and research opportunities on this topic. In conclusion, the application of intent or negligence to a specific case will depend on the evidence presented to the judge, both by the Public Prosecutor’s Office at the time of indictment and by the defense during the presentation of the response to the charges. Thus, the classification of the conduct ceases to be of an objective nature and becomes subjectively evaluated by the judge.

https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v5i01.1911
TRAFFIC CRIMES (Português (Brasil))

References

BITENCOURT, C. R. Tratado de Direito Penal: Parte Geral. 22. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012. Citado na página 10.

BRASIL. Código de Trânsito Brasileiro. Lei nº 9.503, 1997. Disponível em: https://www:planalto:gov:br/ccivil_03/leis/l9503compilado:htm. Acesso em: 02/03/2023. Citado na página 11.

BRASIL. Lei nº 7.209, de 11 de julho de 1984. Institui o Código Penal, julho 1984. Disponível em: http://www:planalto:gov:br/ccivil_03/Leis/L7209:htm. Acesso em: 19/04/2023. Citado na página 10.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. RECURSO ESPECIAL Nº 1.689.173 - SC (2017/0199915-2), v. 2017, novembro 2017. Disponível em: https://processo:stj:jus:br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente= ITA&sequencial=1658939&num_registro=201701999152&data=20180326&formato=PDF. Acesso em: 19/04/2023. Citado na página 15.

CAPEZ, F. Curso de Direito Penal. 19. ed. Salvador: Saraiva, 2017. Citado na página 10.

CUNHA, R. S. Manual de Direito Penal: Parte Geral. Salvador: Juspodivm, 2018. Citado na página 9.

NUCCI, G. de S. Código Penal Comentado. 19. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais. 108 p. Citado na página 9.

NUCCI, G. de S. Manual de Direito Penal: Parte Geral. 10. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2016. 264 p. Citado 2 vezes nas páginas 10 e 13.

SOARES, R. Acusado diz que não jogou o carro contra árvore para matar a esposa. 2023. Jornal Online. Disponível em: https://jc:ne10:uol:com:br/colunas/mobilidade/2023/04/ 15442221-feminicidio-no-transito-acusado-diz-que-nao-jogou-o-carro-contra-arvore-para- matar-a-esposa:html. Acesso em: 16/04/2023. Citado na página 12.

SUPREMO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA. Dolo eventual. Resultados previstos, riscos assumidos: o dolo eventual no crime de homicídio., julho 2022. Disponível em: https://www:stj:jus:br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/12062022-Resultados- previstos--riscos-assumidos-o-dolo-eventual-no-crime-de-homicidio:aspx. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2023. Citado na página 10.

ZAFFARONI, E. R.; PIERANGELI, J. H. Manual de Direito Penal Brasileiro: Parte Geral. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2016. Citado na página 9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...